Oct. 6th, 2001

johnpalmer: (Default)
I was talking to someone about taking care of yourself. I was trying to find a reason to say "you have to take care of yourself", but couldn't come up with a good explanation for something that seems, to me, to be an elemental truth.

I think that the key is that only you really know your own needs. No one else has as good a chance to be able to guess what it is that will make you happy. This isn’t to say that someone else might not have the key to make you happy... it’s a statement that only you have the results of direct input into your condition. You can know if you’re hungry, or thirsty, or lonely.

In some cases, another person might see things that you haven’t. For example, another person might remember that you’ve been feeling unhappy about your job situation when you’ve more or less resigned yourself to it at this time. However, only you could say that you still do find your job frustrating. You might, no matter how unlikely it is, have decided that you actually enjoy your job.

(Er, just in case this becomes a journal entry, please understand that I’m not saying that it’s unlikely that anyone will enjoy their job. However, if you have a doctorate in high energy physics, and are cleaning toilets for a living, you might find that to be a constant frustration, and even if you’ve decided, right now, that you can live with it for a while, another person might remember it.)

The trouble is that people are adaptible. People who are in a bad situation can stop thinking about it, or can learn to handle things that would be intolerable under some circumstances. If you spend your time thinking about bad things, you can almost always depress yourself, so I’d guess that this is a sort of survival trait. So, it’s not really surprising that you can ‘unthink’ about something depressing. Plus, as I’ve noted before, I sometimes think that depression could be a survival mechanism gone wrong. By putting (You? Well, let’s say “Me” instead...) me into a disaffective state, it keeps me from noticing pleasant things, but it also keeps me from noticing unpleasant things. Everything becomes a sort of uniform grey.

I think that it is probably a good thing for survival... the emotional equivalent of endorphins, which can shut down pain. I’m not sure if endorphins cut down on pleasure long term, though. It doesn’t matter; it’s not supposed to be a precise metaphor.

Anyway... other people can sometimes have better memories, or even better ideas about what might make you happy, but only you have any real idea if they will, or won’t, make you happy. Only you can decide that the new career choice that someone suggested is something that you realy would enjoy.

So, in the end, the only person who can decide when it’s time to do something for yourself is you. Others can reality-check your assumptions or ideas, but they can’t decide what really is best for you. (At least, not if you’re a self-aware adult.)

So, really, the only person who can possibly take good care of you is yourself. If you accept it as a given that people should be taken care of, then it’s obvious that you have a responsibility to take care of yourself... not because you’re some wonderful person, but because you’re the only one who can do it.
johnpalmer: (Default)
I was talking to someone about taking care of yourself. I was trying to find a reason to say "you have to take care of yourself", but couldn't come up with a good explanation for something that seems, to me, to be an elemental truth.

I think that the key is that only you really know your own needs. No one else has as good a chance to be able to guess what it is that will make you happy. This isn’t to say that someone else might not have the key to make you happy... it’s a statement that only you have the results of direct input into your condition. You can know if you’re hungry, or thirsty, or lonely.

In some cases, another person might see things that you haven’t. For example, another person might remember that you’ve been feeling unhappy about your job situation when you’ve more or less resigned yourself to it at this time. However, only you could say that you still do find your job frustrating. You might, no matter how unlikely it is, have decided that you actually enjoy your job.

(Er, just in case this becomes a journal entry, please understand that I’m not saying that it’s unlikely that anyone will enjoy their job. However, if you have a doctorate in high energy physics, and are cleaning toilets for a living, you might find that to be a constant frustration, and even if you’ve decided, right now, that you can live with it for a while, another person might remember it.)

The trouble is that people are adaptible. People who are in a bad situation can stop thinking about it, or can learn to handle things that would be intolerable under some circumstances. If you spend your time thinking about bad things, you can almost always depress yourself, so I’d guess that this is a sort of survival trait. So, it’s not really surprising that you can ‘unthink’ about something depressing. Plus, as I’ve noted before, I sometimes think that depression could be a survival mechanism gone wrong. By putting (You? Well, let’s say “Me” instead...) me into a disaffective state, it keeps me from noticing pleasant things, but it also keeps me from noticing unpleasant things. Everything becomes a sort of uniform grey.

I think that it is probably a good thing for survival... the emotional equivalent of endorphins, which can shut down pain. I’m not sure if endorphins cut down on pleasure long term, though. It doesn’t matter; it’s not supposed to be a precise metaphor.

Anyway... other people can sometimes have better memories, or even better ideas about what might make you happy, but only you have any real idea if they will, or won’t, make you happy. Only you can decide that the new career choice that someone suggested is something that you realy would enjoy.

So, in the end, the only person who can decide when it’s time to do something for yourself is you. Others can reality-check your assumptions or ideas, but they can’t decide what really is best for you. (At least, not if you’re a self-aware adult.)

So, really, the only person who can possibly take good care of you is yourself. If you accept it as a given that people should be taken care of, then it’s obvious that you have a responsibility to take care of yourself... not because you’re some wonderful person, but because you’re the only one who can do it.

Envy

Oct. 6th, 2001 05:14 am
johnpalmer: (Default)
Every now and then, I feel bad that people don’t understand what’s going on. Part of the problem is that I don’t really have it put together myself.

This gets a bit personal, and deep, and I want to test the LJ cut link anyway, so let me try it here...

Read more... )

Envy

Oct. 6th, 2001 05:14 am
johnpalmer: (Default)
Every now and then, I feel bad that people don’t understand what’s going on. Part of the problem is that I don’t really have it put together myself.

This gets a bit personal, and deep, and I want to test the LJ cut link anyway, so let me try it here...

Read more... )
johnpalmer: (Default)
Okay... see, I got this laptop working, and it is *SWEET*. I mean, we're talking *185*, you dig me? I mean, * *ONE* HUNDRED EIGHTY-FIVE*!

What do you mean you don't get it? I have a fully functional laptop computer that runs everything I need, it even seems to have a functional battery that will probably last five or more minutes, and it was only $185.

And, see, it runs *WELL*. It's a 90mhz Pentium (only problem: 90mhz means a 60mhz bus... but that won't be much of serious problem. Still, a 100mhz pentium means a 66mhz bus, leading to a more-than-11% increase in speed (11% from 90 to 100, 1/9th an increase)

ahem. Okay, that proves that I *AM* a geek, right? Anyway: 40 megs of memory (do y'all remember when that was *GOOD*? When it cost, like, $200 for that much memory? Instead of $20 for 128 (or is it 256, now?) megs?, two gigs of hard drive space, a CD-ROM, and floppy drive... it's nice. Now, if I can only manage to use it to study more at work.

Speaking of which....
johnpalmer: (Default)
Okay... see, I got this laptop working, and it is *SWEET*. I mean, we're talking *185*, you dig me? I mean, * *ONE* HUNDRED EIGHTY-FIVE*!

What do you mean you don't get it? I have a fully functional laptop computer that runs everything I need, it even seems to have a functional battery that will probably last five or more minutes, and it was only $185.

And, see, it runs *WELL*. It's a 90mhz Pentium (only problem: 90mhz means a 60mhz bus... but that won't be much of serious problem. Still, a 100mhz pentium means a 66mhz bus, leading to a more-than-11% increase in speed (11% from 90 to 100, 1/9th an increase)

ahem. Okay, that proves that I *AM* a geek, right? Anyway: 40 megs of memory (do y'all remember when that was *GOOD*? When it cost, like, $200 for that much memory? Instead of $20 for 128 (or is it 256, now?) megs?, two gigs of hard drive space, a CD-ROM, and floppy drive... it's nice. Now, if I can only manage to use it to study more at work.

Speaking of which....

Profile

johnpalmer: (Default)
johnpalmer

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  1 2 345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 7th, 2025 03:22 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios