johnpalmer (
johnpalmer) wrote2016-12-07 12:09 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Still not dead (or king) - interlude
I'm still thinking of how a person with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome can fight back against the GOP, in hopes of making them sane again. Blogging is all I can think of. I'm not sure if I should try to blog elsewhere, or just say what I have to say here (or seeing if LongHairedWeirdo - my nom du blog - is available on LJ/DW). Any thoughts?
Interlude: At work, there are a collection of clever and cute bumper stickers. One bothered me for a long time... I finally figured it out recently, though.
It shows a picture of a brain, and a > (greater than) sign. On the right hand side, it had sigma (sum of) i = 1 to n, of (a picture of a bear)/n.
So:
brain picture > (sum from 1 to n) of (bearpicture)-sub-i, divided by n
Can you figure it out?
Hint: think cartoon
Interlude: At work, there are a collection of clever and cute bumper stickers. One bothered me for a long time... I finally figured it out recently, though.
It shows a picture of a brain, and a > (greater than) sign. On the right hand side, it had sigma (sum of) i = 1 to n, of (a picture of a bear)/n.
So:
brain picture > (sum from 1 to n) of (bearpicture)-sub-i, divided by n
Can you figure it out?
Hint: think cartoon
no subject
One of the additional tricky bits was realizing that it was "Bear-sub-i" not "bear * i" which could be "imaginary bear" or could be 1 bear when i = 1, 2 bears when i =2, etc..
But I couldn't think of how a brain is greater than a sum and quotient of imaginary bears, or now a brain is greater than (n+1)/2 bears.
no subject
no subject